ETL using SSDB · Microsoft Data Technology · Microsoft SSDB

SSDB – Part 1. ETL – Flush and Fill Versus Incremental Loading

Flush and Fill Verses Incremental Loading

A great place to begin when designing an ETL process is to decide if you will use an incremental load versus the simpler flush and fill technique. With incremental loading, you insert, update, or delete data in destination tables that have changed in the source table on a row by row basis.

Flush and fill is the opposite of incremental loading. Flush and fill completely refreshes the data, by first removing all of the existing data in a destination table and then refilling that table with the source’s current data.

Once you know the advantages and disadvantages to both, you may choose to use one technique on some tables, and the other on the rest

Note: Microsoft is the owner of the content and video in this blog post.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s